on thinking for oneself. Like many of Wittgenstein's works, this was compiled after his death from notes he had made. Sabina Lovibond argues for a kind of Wittgensteinian Realism in ethics in her Realism and Imagination in Ethics and the influence of Wittgenstein is clear in Raimond Gaita's Good and Evil: An Absolute Conception. His approach to such problems is painstaking, thorough, open-eyed and receptive. It is generally supposed that Mill writes with a lovers extravagance about Harriets powers. By his eighth year he had read in the original Greek Aesops.
He spent most of the rest of his life at a villa at Saint-Véran, near Avignon, returning to his house at Blackheath only for a short period in each year. Saying this is hardly satisfactory, but there is no simple answer to the question "What is pain?" Wittgenstein offers not an empathy research paper answer but a kind of philosophical 'therapy' intended to clear away what can seem so obscure. To judge the value of this therapy, the reader will just have to read Wittgenstein's work for herself. Much of this he did in Ireland, preferring isolated rural places for his work. If metaphysical Realism is incoherent then so is its opposite. With whom could he or she agree? Logic and mathematics are the alphabet of the book of nature, not the book itself. Russell attaches considerable importance to forming one's own opinions, and this might seem to betray an unwarranted confidence in an individual's ability to avoid dependence on expert knowledge, an issue which recent discussions concerning trust in knowledge have brought to the fore. What is conceivable and what is not, what makes sense and what does not, depends on the rules of language, of grammar.